My 2 Buck$

Rush Limbaugh is really a Democrat

December 10, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Rush Limbaugh is brilliant.  He is an entertainer.  And after 8 years of Bush is clearly . . . a Democrat.

There is no other way to explain it. 

What Limbaugh does as well as anyone is create division.  He motivates his lemmings dittoheads by using buzzwords like ‘socialist’.  

He has led the Republicans in a charge of obstructionism never before seen in politics.  Being the opposition party is not about saying ‘no’ to everything.  It is about working with the other party in order to reach a workable compromise.  But after years of forcing right wing legislation down Americans throats, the Republicans have evidently decided to reject anything that comes from the Democratic Party.

But it doesn’t stop there.

Rush Limbaugh has also made it his mission to go after any Republican who is willing to work with the Democrats in order to reach a compromise.  He is attacking any Republican for not being ‘conservative enough’.

Look at the debacle in the NY-23.  The Republican candidate withdrew from the election after a Conservative candidate entered the race and said the Republican was not conservative enough.  The Republican ended up endorsing the Democrat and the Conservative candidate lost.

Limbaugh is now targeting popular Republican Florida Governor Charlie Crist in his U.S. Senate quest instead going with rightwing Marco Rubio. 

Crist would most likely win big in the General Election but because Limbaugh says he isn’t conservative enough is opting for the polarizing Rubio – who potentially could push moderates and independents to the Democratic candidate.

Limbaugh has even taken to criticizing Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) for not outright rejecting the Healthcare Reform Bill.  Limbaugh acknowledges that McConnell is against the bill but is adding amendments to the existing bill instead of rejecting it. 

“They just need to say no; there’s nothing wrong with saying no to this!”

The Democrats do enough to shoot themselves in the foot.  They introduced a poor healthcare reform bill that didn’t allow for compromise as it eliminated the liberal preferred single-payer option and are now negotiating the removal of the public option.  The bill smells of corporate interests and does nothing to improve healthcare coverage for Americans.

If Republicans work toward this ‘compromise’, they will come out huge winners.  This bill will push many moderates and independents toward the Republicans and will discourage liberals and progressives from voting next year.

Progressives and liberals are thinking that with an overwhelming majority in Congress and the White House behind healthcare reform legislation, a decent bill that provides quality healthcare coverage to all Americans and doesn’t cater to insurance and pharmaceutical companies should have been easy to pass.

Instead, what we see is a thousand plus page embarrassment of a bill that does nothing to change the mess we’re in.

All Limbaugh and company had to do was sit back and point to the garbage legislation that is coming from the Democrats.  ‘Look, the Republicans are working to try to improve that rubbish by introducing amendments to the bill …”

But Limbaugh criticizes the more moderate in his party trying to take the Republicans even further to the right.  In a year (2010) that was expected to see an incredible swing back towards the Republicans, is Limbaugh supporting candidates that are generally unelectable in state-wide elections. 

Rubio is strong in his Republican district but if the Democrats put up a viable option, the Republicans could lose the state that they have controlled in the Governor’s mansion for 12 years.  Moderates and Independents most likely would wind up voting for the Democrat over a far rightwing Republican especially when their preferred candidate – Crist – was thrown under the bus by his own party.

Where Limbaugh is intelligent, he certainly has to know that by supporting far-right candidates he will push the moderates and independents to the left – allowing for Democrats to have a successful 2010 campaign.  As long as he keeps this up, I’m glad to have him part of the Democratic Party.

On a personal note:  I am a fan of Charlie Crist – except when he is running for office.  If the Republicans don’t want him and choose Rubio in their primary, I hope Crist pulls a ‘Joe Lieberman’ – either running as an Independent or as a Democrat. 

My 2 Buck$

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Democrats · Politics · Republicans
Tagged: , , ,

Comcast to buy stake in NBC – Antitrust laws put to the test

December 8, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Time to dust off the antitrust laws.  Comcast is purchasing 51 percent of NBC Universal from General Electric.  There really is nothing positive about this merger.

First the deal:

General Electric, which owns 80 percent of NBC Universal, has reached an agreement to purchase the 20 percent owned by French media giant Vivendi for $5.8 billion.

GE will in turn sell 51 percent of NBC Universal to Comcast (the number 1 U.S. cable company) for $13.75 billion.

About Comcast:

Comcast is the number 1 cable company in the United States serving roughly one-quarter of all American households in 39 states.  They own Versus, The Golf Channel, E! Entertainment and regional sports channels.

About NBC Universal:

NBC Universal owns NBC, CNBC, MSNBC, Universal Studios, NBC Universal Television Group, USA, Syfy, Bravo, iVillage, qubo, Telemundo, The Weather Channel, Hulu.  They also own more than 25 television stations across the country and theme parks.

Concerns & Impacts:

The sales pitch written in the papers addressed movies appearing on cable faster.  I guess they’re not talking about the straight-to-cable trash that shows up now.  And Comcast may allow television shows to become available on cell phones and other devices.  (A Hulu app for the iPhone?  There really is an app for everything!)

We have heard rumors that Hulu’s free days could be coming to an end.  This purchase could ensure that.

There could also be a big concern with Comcast restricting access to content that they own or by raising the costs for that content to their competition.  DirecTV has already dropped Comcast-owned Versus because of an alleged rate increase.  (about 21 cents to 26 cents per subscriber per month).  Versus brings phenomenal programming like National Hockey League games and bull riding. 

There is another battle between the two companies over Comcast-owned regional sports networks. 

No doubt, Comcast will pull the same garbage over their new NBC networks.  They could charge higher prices to the competition (DirecTV, uVerse, Dish) for the stations they own (NBC, USA, SyFy, etc) thus making it financially beneficial for customers to jump to Comcast.  They could wind up being the only company offering USA and MSNBC in some markets. 

Isn’t that one of the reasons why the antitrust laws are in place?

After the problems Comcast has already caused for DirecTV, don’t be surprised if DirecTV and AT&T (uVerse) try to purchase other media companies in order to compete and keep Comcast in line.  This would undoubtedly reduce competition.

The last time we saw a merger like this was the debacle merger between AOL and Time Warner.  As a result, Time Warner Cable has spun off into its own company and AOL is spinning off this week. 

Another potential issue is station placement.  Don’t think for a second that Comcast wouldn’t move all of its company-owned content to premiere locations or on basic packages while the competition is on less desirable channels / tiers. 

MSNBC (Comcast owned) can reside on their basic tier package while competitors Fox News and CNN could wind up on higher channel numbers and more expensive packages. 

It’s a bit ironic really.  Fox News and its conservative leanings believe in this capitalist corporate takeover mentality.  As a result of a deal like this one, their station could find themselves in a higher channel location hidden between a religious station and C-SPAN 3 or on a higher tier which charges more money to customers in order to receive the channel. 

As the Fox News demographic is older – most have cable rather than satellite.   Few spend the extra money for the higher packaged tiers.  Many residing in condominiums take the basic cable package which often is included in their homeowner’s fees.  So, if Fox News was in the highest tier package, many seniors (Fox News viewers) would be left out. 

Ruppert Murdock should be calling all Republicans demanding that they come out against this merger – unless he can purchase Disney which will provide Murdock with a stronger bargaining position. 

It’s time we stand up and make sure that this Comcast / NBC Universal deal does not occur.  It is bad for competition and bad for customers.

Sources:

Comcast-NBC deal moves closer after GE to buy Vivendi’s NBC stake for $5.8B – Daily Finance

Mega-Media Era Begins:  GE/Vivendi Deal Clears Way for Comcast/NBC Merger – The Huffington Post

Comcast’s big bet:  Deal for control of NBC Universal comes with risks and opposition – Sun-Sentinel

Comcast Gets NBC From G.E. in Deal That Reshapes TV – The New York Times

The NBC Universal sale by the numbers -  The New York Times

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Politics
Tagged: , , , , ,

Going Rogue and Going Rouge: the coloring book – Can anyone tell the difference?

November 19, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Sarah Palin’s memoir Going Rogue:  An American Tale Life is on bookshelves now.  David Letterman has offered a series of more enjoyable options to reading her story; like getting impaled by a rod and getting crushed by a dumpster. 

News sources have quickly begun fact checking her book and there are plenty.  Even John McCain’s camp has challenged a couple of points from the book.

Either way, it sits atop the best seller list.  I know many books have been ‘sold’ in bulk sales but still many, many people are lining up to purchase this book.  I’m certain her lemmings supporters will display this book proudly on their coffee tables and sit on every word written by ghostwriter Lynn Vincent (as told to her by Palin).

Meanwhile, her detractors are lining up to buy the book in order to rip it to shreds.

Regardless, it adds up to huge book sales for Palin – which is in no way a surprise.

Here is an invitation to a ‘Going Rogue’ Book Launch Social.  Doesn’t that seem like fun?

Fact #1:  I will not buy the book nor will I read the book.

Here is a wonderful alternative:  Going Rouge:  Sarah Palin An American Nightmare which is a collection of essays written by 23 collaborators and was the innovation of the editors of The Nation magazine.  Though the writing is probably right up my alley, I will not be able to sit for too long with this book nor would I be able to have this book displayed anywhere in my home. 

I suspect that her conservative base may mistakenly purchase Going Rouge: The Sarah Palin Rogue Coloring & Activity Book.

You betcha – it’s a coloring book.  ;)

My 2 Buck$

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Democrats · McCain - Palin · Politics · Republicans · Sarah Palin
Tagged: , ,

How dare Obama bow – but it’s fine for Bush and Nixon

November 18, 2009 · 3 Comments

The cable dial was loaded with idiots criticizing President Barack Obama for bowing to the Emperor of Japan.

‘We don’t bow,” these morons cried.  Fox News, CNN, talk radio – the list goes on.  Doesn’t anyone fact check?  Doesn’t anyone do a Google search?

I did hear that President Obama wasn’t the first U.S. president to bow.  Keith Olbermann, Jon Stewart and Randi Rhodes all mentioned it.

One doesn’t have to go much farther than George W. Bush to see that a U.S. president does, in fact, bow …

… and hold hands …

… and kiss.

President Obama’s bow was more respectful than President George H.W. Bush throwing up on the Japanese Prime Minister in 1992.

Even President Ronald Reagan bowed when appropriate.

President Dwight Eisenhower bowed to French President Charles De Gaulle in 1959.

Anyone remember that President Richard Nixon bowed to the Emperor of Japan Hirohito?

I’m sick of these pundits feigning anger and shock when a little research easily makes their claims look ridiculous – however their viewers and readers will never know the truth.

Do you really think the gang on Fox & Friends will tell their viewers that they were wrong when they criticized President Obama for respectfully bowing to a world leader since Presidents Bush, Eisenhower and Nixon did so as well?

→ 3 CommentsCategories: Barack Obama · Democrats · My 2 Buck$ of the Day · Politics · Republicans
Tagged: , , ,

A ‘Bad’ Marlins Fan Speaks Out

November 17, 2009 · Leave a Comment

For years I have been reading and hearing that I am a bad Florida Marlins fan because I do not attend games regularly.

It’s not just me, you understand.  The Marlins enjoy the annual distinction of having the lowest attendance in Major League Baseball.

Here are some of the excuses we have heard as reasons why nobody seems to attend the games

  1. South Florida is a bad sports market
  2. The Marlins play in a stadium designed for football
  3. Potential rain-outs and delays cause fans to stay home

So, Marlins owner, Jeff Loria believes (as previous owners H. Wayne Huizenga and current Boston Red Sox owner John Henry) that if a baseball-only stadium with a retractable roof was constructed it would resolve points 2 and 3 – thereby solving all of the world’s problems.

“People will come.  They’ll come to [Marlins Stadium] for reasons they can’t even fathom.  They’ll turn up [at the stadium] not knowing for sure why they’re doing it.  They’ll arrive … as innocent as children, longing for the past. … It’s only $20 [per beer].  They’ll pass over the money without even thinking about it.”

What these out-of-touch rich people don’t realize is that this isn’t Field of Dreams.  It’s not about the seats in a stadium and it isn’t the worry of going to a game that will be rained out.

It is about having your heart crushed year after year.  Yes, I realize that the Marlins have accomplished something very few teams outside of the Bronx have been able to do.  They won 2 World Series Championships in less than 10 years.

Landshark Stadium - Home of the Marlins

The Marlins made their major league debut as an expansion team in 1993.  I attended the first game at the stadium with a bunch of friends.  The stadium was packed and our seats were deep in the nosebleeds.  But I was at the game and thrilled.  No longer was I going to be subjected to attending baseball games during the exhibition season or on my almost annual trips to New York.

I attended numerous games in 1993 and in the years that followed.  Huizenga and his front office did a great job of mixing in youth and quality higher priced stars and the result was a World Series championship in 1997.

1997 World Champions

For some reason, Huizenga wasn’t happy that the games didn’t sell out immediately and didn’t want to culture a following.  He announced during a mid-season series with the New York Yankees that he planned on reducing the salary after the 1997 season whether the Marlins won or not.

And dump it he did.  The first to go was one of their top hitters, Moises Alou (November 11) followed a week later with trades to closer Robb Nenn and center fielder Devon White.  Two days later fan favorite, Mr. Marlin Jeff Conine was gone.  Next was pitching ace Kevin Brown.

This is how a team wins the World Series and loses over 100 games the next year.

If that’s all it was – but noooooooooooooo.

How’s this for a trade?  May 14, 1998 (the season was one month old) – Traded Manuel Barrios, Bobby Bonilla, Jim Eisenreich, Charles Johnson and Gary Sheffield to the Los Angeles Dodgers in exchange for Mike Piazza and Todd Zeile.  The Dodgers should have been required to change their name to the Marlins after that trade though the trade does seem fair until …

To avoid the high salary, the Marlins traded Piazza 8 days later to the Mets for a few unknown players.

Zeile hung on with the Marlins until the first annual July fire sale when he was sent to Texas.

The salary dump continued – and continued – and continued.  Any player, who moved to the top of the salary chart or if they were due a nice increase during the off-season was traded.  The trades either happened during the winter months or before the July trading deadline when they could get more young talent courtesy of teams vying for a playoff spot.

After the 1998 season, Huizenga sold the team to John Henry but the fire sales and cheapness continued.  Each season, we watched a crop of young players play their hearts out nearly always over-achieving.  Each season, the fans had hopes that we’d get that player to hang our hats on – the player who’d hang around to reach his prime in a Marlins uniform.

Of course it never happened.

Somewhere along the line, John Henry decided to make a pitch for a new baseball only stadium.  He said he didn’t have the money to build one himself, like Joe Robbie had done years earlier for the Miami Dolphins.  He felt the taxpayers should foot the bill and provide him with the profits.

After the 2002 season the big ownership shift occurred.  John Henry sold the Marlins and bought the Boston Red Sox AND Fenway Park (but he didn’t have money).  Jeffrey Loria sold the Montreal Expos (now Washington Nationals) to Major League Baseball and bought the Florida Marlins.

Talk about mixed emotions.  I was thrilled that Henry was gone and pissed that he had the money to buy the Red Sox and their stadium but didn’t have the money to try to build a winner and a fan base here.

Meanwhile, Loria proved to be a cheap owner in Montreal and I knew he’d pull the same garbage here.  Why baseball didn’t try to seek out an owner with some money in their pockets is beyond me.

So, 2003 comes and these young kids played well.  Miguel Cabrera and Dontrelle Willis came up in May and the Marlins changed managers and the next thing you know the Marlins won the World Series.  With a bunch of kids.  They beat the high priced New York Yankees.

One month after winning the World Series, the Marlins traded power hitting first baseman Derrek Lee and a month later rightfielder Juan Encarnacion was gone.  Not to mention the players who left via free agency like catcher Ivan ‘Pudge’ Rodriguez and closer Ugueth Urbina.

The Marlins had just won the World Series again and 3 starters were immediately dumped.  And you wonder why the fans don’t come flowing out to the stadium.

The annual fire sales don’t occur under this regime but what it does is even worse.  The Marlins have the lowest payroll in baseball.  To make matters worse – the money the Marlins take in from league revenue sharing actually exceeds the team payroll.  In other words, any money the team brings in from ticket sales, merchandise, television / radio rights, etc goes right into Loria’s pocket.

The City of Miami is using taxpayer money to build a new baseball only stadium at the site that used to be the Orange Bowl.  Parking and access to this area is weak.  Metro Rail does not have a stop there.

The true Marlins fan base is located in Broward and Palm Beach Counties so building the stadium deep into Miami-Dade County makes little sense – especially since a quality offer was made in Hialeah Gardens only minutes from the Broward County line.

If you think the fan base is going to attend games there, you’ve got another thing coming.  Then Loria will be back to dumping the talent at the regular July fire sale.

So let’s put a little perspective on this.

For the sake of argument let’s use the New York Yankees.  The Yankees won the World Series.  Before Thanksgiving, they let Hideki Matsui and Johnny Damon leave via free agency.  They trade Derek Jeter, Alex Rodriguez, Jorge Posada and AJ Burnett.

2009 World Champion NY Yankees

By 2010, CC Sabathia, Andy Pettitte, Mariano Rivera and Mark Teixeira are gone.  Everyone traded for an unknown set of minor league prospects.

In 2011, with a cast of unknowns, they win 84 games.  The fans fall in love with a couple of the better kids.  During the off season, they’re both traded.

Flash forward 12 seasons.  Their payroll is hovering around $50 million while most teams spend between $150 and $200 million.  They consistently win 80 to 86 games and their best players last maybe 1 or 2 years tops.  They never make a trade to help the team immediately down the stretch.

Feel free to throw in a fluke World Series victory in say 2017.  After that season, the 4 best players are gone.

How long before the Yankees fans stop going to the games?  It’s obvious that the ‘fictitious’ Steinbrenners don’t care.

And I’m ignoring 2 important things here – okay 3.

  1. These are the New York Yankees
  2. They just opened a brand new state-of-the-art stadium this year with easy access.
  3. The Yankees have been around forever and have developed a fan base over generations.

If the Yankees were just not good, they’d still get fans. But if they continually dumped the talent, I believe that many fans would take a hike.  Especially at the prices they charge.

Fans don’t need their teams to win every year.  We just need an owner who acts like he cares about the fans and attempts to have a commitment to winning.  That is what the Marlins have lacked.

An empty Yankee Stadium

→ Leave a CommentCategories: My 2 Buck$ of the Day
Tagged: , , , ,

Halloween for our loyal best friend

November 3, 2009 · 3 Comments

Halloween on a Saturday brought out the crazies and the partiers.  I guess that big full moon also played a part.

My wife shot down my idea to decorate my house as if it was quarantined due to the swine flu (H1N1).  A chalk outline by the front door, police tape roping off part of the area, ‘Enter at Your Own Risk’ signs and speakers set up to play a loop of a person coughing.  I would have put makeup on my face to look like a sick person.  When I opened the door, I’d cough for effect and then put my hand into the bowl with the candy to hand to the kids.

Totally would have creeped people out.  And of course, that’s what I’m about.

Anyway, we went to a nice outdoor shopping area during the day and I have to admit, I was kind of bothered.  The shopping center invited families to come around to their stores and collect candy.

‘Doggie Bars’ were set up around – bowls with water – as it was quite hot and the dogs had to deal with some of the most disturbing things I’ve seen in quite a while.

People dressing up their dogs in costumes.  Of course, it looks cute, but I really wonder if the dogs like it.  I saw 2 or 3 dogs actually crying (yelping).  One was wearing a Gone With the Wind Scarlett O’Hara hat.

Don’t worry boy (or girl) – I would have been crying too if I had been in that costume.

So I started asking myself, is it abusive to dress your pet in a Halloween costume?  What about dressing them up and walking them around in public?  What about when it is almost 90 degrees out?

Unintentionally, the theme was continued only a couple of hours later in another store when I saw a variation of an As Seen on TV product.

snuggie for dogs box

Really?  A Snuggie for dogs?  Look at the eyes on this dog.  Clearly, he is begging for someone to remove the Snuggie.

snuggie_for_dogs

So my brain takes me further down on the pets / As Seen on TV combination.

potty patch

If you have ever seen this commercial, it is one of the most hilarious things I’ve ever seen.  Dogs walk over to the patch and then pose.

Imagine training your dog to go on the Doggie Patch.  There has got to be an odor.  Has to be.

But the best As Seen on TV product of all time:

Potty Putter 2My 2 Buck$

→ 3 CommentsCategories: Humor
Tagged: , , , ,

The Senate Healthcare Reform bill gets worse every day

October 26, 2009 · Leave a Comment

I admit it.  I think the single payer government run option is the best option and anyone who thinks that it will be more expensive really isn’t paying attention.

It really should be a topic of a different post but I will add the following:  think of how much money will be saved alone if we eliminate CEO salaries and bonuses, corporate profits, senior staff salaries, corporate lobbyists (who are cleaning up today) and advertising (for the company and against health care reform).

Okay – to my next point.

All we are really left with is a very detailed, very expensive plan introduced by Max Baucus and the Senate Finance Committee and what they did to bend over backward to get Olympia Snowe’s vote.

Now the debate is hinging on a so-called public option. 

The problem with this is Healthcare reform is really quite simple.  You have to resolve the following questions.

  • Cover 100 percent of Americans. 
  • For Americans 65 and older, cover the portion not currently covered by Medicare. 

If we’re going to allow the insurance companies to continue servicing Americans, the following needs to be solved:

  • No restrictions for pre-existing conditions.
  • Allow for an opt out for employees unhappy with their employer offered plan but enforce the employer contribution.
  • Ensure that coverage is available to all who need access.

We all agree that whatever the plan is, it should lower costs.

*  *  *  *  *

So let’s examine what we have:

Cover 100 percent of Americans.  Can we all agree that if we’re reforming healthcare ALL Americans should have affordable access to coverage?

According to the Baucus bill, 94 percent of Americans will be covered by this plan.  So 6 percent of Americans will not.  That is despicable and completely unacceptable.  Every single article printed discussing this bill should address this horrendous oversight.

Employer mandates:  Believe it or not, the Senate is considering doing away with employer mandates so your employer can let you fend for yourself when it comes to getting healthcare coverage.

Pre-existing conditions:  Last I read, there was a stipulation that pre-existing conditions would be limited to 6 months.  So if you have a heart attack in October and your insurance carrier drops you at the end of the year – you can sign on with another company that will not cover you for any heart ailment for 6 months – so no heart attacks until July.

Employee opt-out:  This one is personal for me.  I have a lousy healthcare plan and it is not cheap.  My premiums and initial annual out of pocket costs are quite high.  And my insurance company can deny treatment that I have had for years because for them there is a cheaper option – without taking into regard that the treatment I am currently on works – without side effects – without any adverse reactions with my other medications. 

So, if I had a cost effective option I can say that I’d be gone.

Today, I read that there will be an opt out plan for the public option – so I got very excited.  That was until I realized that the opt out was for states who didn’t want to participate in the public option.  So in Florida where Republicans outnumber Democrats in the Florida House and Senate by 2 to 1, you can pretty much rest assured that the public option will be shot down here.

By the way – ever wonder why Florida Republicans hold 67% of the seats in Congress in a state where registered Democrats comfortably outnumber Republicans?   Can you say gerrymandering?

Lower costs:  The Finance Committee has thrown around numbers in the $800 billion range over 10 years.  That’s  ‘B’ for billion.  How does a plan that is as close to keeping the status quo as possible actually increasing the costs to the neighborhood of one trillion dollars?

Obviously, there are a large number of issues I didn’t address in this post – just some key ones.

Let me also say that I have 2 healthcare plan ideas that will cover 100 percent of all Americans and lower costs.  One is my take on the single-payer option and the other is a public option type plan that involves the insurance companies and keeps Washington small.  One plan is liberal the other is conservative. 

Both options can be designed to cover all Americans and lower costs but they both start to fail when you throw in compromises. 

To get real reform, Congress should meet with financial experts to review the requirements, options and costs and determine which one will be most cost effective, easiest to implement and maintain and provides the best coverage for Americans.  

All I know is this Finance Committee Bill that we’re seeing now isn’t it and each day it only gets worse.

 hcr3

hcr1

hcr2

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Barack Obama · Democrats · Politics · Republicans
Tagged: , , , , , ,

People watching at the mall – Men in Capris

October 26, 2009 · Leave a Comment

This past weekend my wife and I took our walking indoors to Sawgrass Mills Mall in Sunrise.  It is a very large tourist trap / discount mall which attracts people from all over including tours from the cruise lines.

One of the things we enjoy is people-watching.  It adds a little excitement to the walk and sometimes we look at a specific fashion style or accessory.  During our recent time in EPCOT, I was on the lookout for people wearing crocs. 

At least they match the shirt

At least they match the shirt

Sunday, I began by looking for men wearing fanny bags.  Except for senior citizen men, this has been out of style for around 20 years.  I’m still trying to forget that I used to wear one – along with my zubaz. 

Zubaz and a suit.  Now that's class

Zubaz and a suit. Now that's class

I wasn’t inside the mall more than 3 minutes before I identified 2 men wearing fanny packs. 

a good use of fanny pack

I'm glad he's wearing a fanny pack

Do you want to tell him?

Do you want to tell him?

Then my wife informed me of her fashion oddity.  She would be looking for men wearing capris.  Thanks to a Christopher Titus standup routine, each time she saw one, she said to me that he’d have to ‘turn in his man card.’

I have to admit, it was fun seeking out the manpris.   Pants on a man that taper around the calf and shin with ties or buttons is just plain wrong.  Even if it is in style – just like zubaz. 

capri 1

capri 2

We saw one man in his 20’s wearing shorts that they wore in the 1970’s.  You only see those frighteningly short shorts on senior citizen men who have decided they want to start exercising and those are the only shorts they own.

1970's shorts

I was flabbergasted when I saw someone wearing what appeared to be regular jeans with the leg cuffs folded up a couple of times ending around his calfs. 

No comment

No comment

We saw dozens in the 90 minutes we were walking and they varied from khaki to jean capris.  We even saw a man who looked like he fell out of Woodstock in the 1960’s wearing stone washed, torn, ragged jean capris.  It was hilarious – along with his unwashed, frazzled gray pony tail.

What we found amazing was that you could not pin down the Capri phenomenon to a specific stereotype.  Young, old, black, white, American, European.  It didn’t matter.  It seems like we saw all cultures covered. 

The only thing was certain.  Men should not wear capris and if they do – they must turn in their man card. 

man-card

 

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Humor · My 2 Buck$ of the Day
Tagged: , , , ,

Holocaust denier who attacked Elie Wiesel is now suing 80-year-old woman

October 21, 2009 · 2 Comments

Eric Hunt’s attorney in his Elie Wiesel trial called him mentally ill and not a hate monger.

“He’s recovered.” Said attorney John Runfola.  “He’s not a Holocaust denier.”

This non-hate monger, Holocaust believer now filed a lawsuit in Broward Circuit Court against 80-year-old Irene Weisberg Zisblatt claiming that her memoir ‘The Fifth Diamond: The Story of Irene Weisberg Zisblatt” is full of “vicious lies” and “fantastical tales”.

Zisblatt’s memoir recounts her ordeal while in the Auschwitz-Birkenau death camp during World War II.

Holocaust denier Eric Hunt

Holocaust denier Eric Hunt

Hunt’s claim is that her book turns Jews into haters and torments non-Jews.  Is his implication that Zisblatt and Wiesel have tormented him while simultaneously making Jews hate him?

In Hunt’s libel suit, he is demanding a jury trial and punitive damages of “not less than $60 million.”

Hunt is a convicted felon of a hate crime so it seems shocking if this case ever gets to trial since it obvious that his anti-Semitic views are behind this suit.  It will be up to Circuit Judge Peter Weinstein.

“Zisblatt blatantly stole other Jewish people’s experiences during World War II and passed them off as her own in order to further the Jewish political agenda and profit off of these fantastical tales,” Hunt, who is representing himself without an attorney, wrote in his lawsuit. “The defendants must not go unpunished for tormenting Gentiles and instilling hatred in Jews using such hideous lies.”

In addition to Zisblatt, the defendants include Steven Spielberg (Zisblatt appeared in his 1998 Academy Award winning documentary “The Last Days”),  Gail Ann Webb (Zisblatt’s co-author), Authors & Artists Publishers Inc. of New York and its CEO, Joan Mayor.

Hunt attacks Wiesel

On February 1, 2007, Eric Hunt attacked Nobel Peace Prize winner Elie Wiesel in an Argent Hotel elevator in San Francisco.

Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel

Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel

Wiesel was attending an interfaith conference at the time.

Hunt pulled Wiesel from the elevator on the sixth floor.

Hunt, who had pleaded insanity, was convicted on one of the charges – the felony hate crime charge of false imprisonment – and was sentenced to two years.  He was credited with the 18 months already served and good behavior.  He was also ordered to undergo psychological treatment.

Apparently, this didn’t work.

At sentencing, Hunt apologized and said he had suffered a “severe mental breakdown.  I had been sucked into anti-Semitic conspiracy theories on the Internet,” Hunt said in August 2008. “I don’t believe any of that garbage now that I’m taking my medication.”

Maybe he stopped taking his medication.

Hunt had been charged with a total of six felonies.  He was also convicted of two of the other charges – battery and elderly abuse which was cut to misdemeanors after the jury rejected hate crime enhancements for them.

I’m surprised that the jury would reject this as a hate crime especially since the case involved Hunt trying to coerce Wiesel to renounce the Holocaust and Hunt later boasted about the attack on Holocaust denier websites on the internet.

When police had found Hunt after the Wiesel attack, he was at a mental health treatment center in Belle Mead, NJ..  Before the attack, Hunt had also stalked Wiesel in Florida.

Stupid or proud?

Five days after Wiesel was attacked, a man identifying himself as Hunt posted a detailed account of the crime on several anti-Semitic and anti-Israel Web sites. That account matched a description of the attack police provided a few days later. In the online post, Hunt said he cornered Wiesel, the author of more than 40 books based on his Holocaust experiences, to force him into admitting that the Holocaust never occurred.

Frank Hunt, Eric’s father said, “I think he might be mentally ill.  I’m worried about his mental health.”

Mentally ill or a nasty son of a bitch bigot?  You decide.

I guess the endless hours of video and the infinite number of pictures don’t offer enough proof to those intent on hating Jews.  There are so many websites that spew this hatred and what I find amazing is the high number of liberal and well-known websites that permitted hate to be shared in their comment boards.

Here are some pictures – I guess the deniers are calling this photoshop work before there was photoshop.

Holocaust 1

Holocaust 2

Holocaust 3

Holocaust 4

holocaust 5

holocaust 6

Resources

Holocaust denier sues Pembroke Pines survivor and author, 80 – South Florida Sun-Sentinel – 19-OCT-2009

Man, 22, arrested in N.J. in Wiesel attack – San Francisco Chronicle – 17-FEB-2007

Jury convicts man in attack on Elie Wiesel: Defendant guilty of a felony hate crime, two misdemeanors – San Francisco Chronicle  – 22-JUL-2008

Wiesel’s Wispy Whacker Pleads Wacky – SF IST – 29-NOV-2007

→ 2 CommentsCategories: News
Tagged: , , , ,

Toxic Chinese Drywall – When is Enough Enough?

October 20, 2009 · 2 Comments

Toxic Chinese toys have faded into memory, now used as comedic fodder for late night talk show hosts along with Dick Cheney shooting the guy in the face.

The major Chinese import issue that doesn’t get the type of publicity it should is the toxic drywall being used in construction projects.

The problem is becoming more widespread not because more homes are currently being built with imported Chinese drywall but the effects of the drywall previously installed are now coming to light.

Overview:

Most homes affected will have been built between 2003 and 2007 – during the peak hurricane years.  As such, homes in the southeast, Gulf coast, Texas and southwest will have the heaviest concentration though the drywall has been found in most states in the US and in Canada.

The initial symptom usually is a sulfur type of smell (rotten egg).  Other things homeowners discovered is the failure of the air conditioning system (A/C coils) and corrosion of the electrical wiring.

Residents also reported respiratory problems, headaches and nose bleeds.  Pets have inexplicably died, jewelry tarnished and appliances would stop working – failed coils and elements.

What is pathetic is that no one is willing to help the owners of these toxic homes.

Insurance companies are cancelling the policies of these homeowners.

The builders who used the imported drywall both deny knowledge and are ignoring the homeowners’ calls.

Lenders are rejecting homeowner’s requests of walking away from these homes.

The media refuses to properly cover or investigate this matter.

History of Imported Chinese products

Back in 2007, I was extremely frustrated that the MSM seemed to ignore the imports coming in from China.  On the internet, I had found reports of tainted pet food, chicken and fish feed, toothpaste, imported fish, honey and tires.  I reported about it on my now defunct website under a heading called – Is China Purposely Poisoning Us?

The story finally hit the headlines when it was reported that our imported children’s toys proved to be tainted with lead-based paint.  This was followed in July, 2007 with the execution of the Chinese head of food safety.

As time progressed, I found only comedians like Bill Maher and Jon Stewart would address the matter.

Now, we’re about a year or so into this latest revelation of imported Chinese drywall.

Still, we deal with the Chinese with kid gloves evidently because our economies are now fused together to put it mildly.

Before I purchase any product, I check the label to make certain that the product was not made in China.  I am afraid to wear something (like socks) that was imported from China.  I will not eat any food prepared in something made in China (rice cooker) nor will I purchase a coffee mug from there.

I’m not certain that it will harm me but the history has proven that I can not take any chances.  It takes too long to get wind of these problems and the media is being irresponsible by essentially ignoring this very important issue.

What can we do?

First, go to Chinese Drywall Complaint Center.

This site provides many more details including an overview, indications, what to do and so much more.  It is an important website if you know or even suspect that your home contains drywall imported from China.

The website recommends that you contact your doctor, the State health department, Homeowners Consumer Center / America’s Watchdog and your government representatives.

The more noise made about this the better.  I’d also contact the local television news stations to see if anyone would be willing to broadcast.

Don’t forget to check with your neighbors because if your homes were constructed about the same time and your house is suffering the effects of toxic drywall, the likelihood that some of your neighbors have the problem is quite high.

I was driving over the weekend in Broward County, Florida and saw an extremely large sign posted on a house that said ‘Toxic House Sold by Stonebrook’.

CBS 4 in Miami covered this story and it is worth the read and there is a video.  [Click here]

When I drove by the house on Monday (I wanted to take a picture for this story) but the sign was removed.  I wonder who demanded that the sign come down.

We really need to focus more on this issue as it is clear that our government and media will not properly give this story the attention it needs and deserves.

Additional reading:

Is Drywall the Next Chinese Import Scandal – Time – 23-MAR-2009.

Chinese Drywall Problem - another great resource

Homeowners with toxic Chinese drywall have gotten no help, and in many cases, have no resources left to keep their families safe – The Times-Picayune (NOLA.com) – 07-JUN-2009

My 2 Cents old Website from 2007.  If you want to check out some of my old links – click on Is China Purposely Poisoning Us?

coils

Toxic house

→ 2 CommentsCategories: News · Politics
Tagged: , ,

Greed gone wild – Insurance companies go after the Baucus Healthcare ‘Lack of’ Reform Bill

October 13, 2009 · Leave a Comment

There is something definitely wrong with the Democrats.  They have a huge majority in the House and Senate AND the White House.  Poll after poll show that the people support a public option.

So this headline from the AP should have been baffling.  “Dems scramble after warning from health insurers.

I’ll tell you, it got me to open this article.

WASHINGTON – Insurance companies aren’t playing nice any more. Their dire message that health care legislation will drive up premiums for people who already have coverage comes as a warning shot at a crucial point in the debate, and threatens President Barack Obama’s top domestic priority.

When did the insurance companies ever play nice?  They do have their facts straight however.  This bill presented by the Senate Finance Committee and Max Baucus will drive up premiums.  This bill was written FOR the insurance companies.  Now they’re pulling this crap?!?

The insurance companies served up a nice slow pitch and this is how the White House, AARP and Max Baucus responded!

“This is a distorted and flawed report from the insurance industry and cannot be taken seriously. This so-called analysis appears on the eve of a vote that may eat into the insurance industry’s profits. It conveniently ignores policies that will lower costs for those who have insurance, expand coverage and provide affordable insurance options to millions of Americans.” – Reid H. Cherlin, a White House spokesman.

“Distorted and flawed.” – White House spokeswoman Linda Douglass.

“Fundamentally dishonest.” – AARP’s senior policy strategist, John Rother.

“A hatchet job.” – A spokesman for Senate Finance Committee chairman Max Baucus, D-Montana.

The Democrats criticized the report.  They need to go after the insurance companies.

I so wish the Democrats had some stones.  They should have said ‘yes – this legislation will drive up the costs – because we are catering to the insurance companies.  Want to keep the price down – kick them out of the mix.”

“No more CEO salaries.  No more senior management salaries.  No more corporate profits.  No more lobbyists.  No more Congressional fundraisers.”

How many insurance companies are there?  You do the math.  Millions and millions saved annually.

Our premiums remain about the same and EVERYONE gets coverage.  We could pay for the uninsured and all of our co-pays with the millions saved in salaries, profits, lobbyists, advertising, and so on.

In addition to the insurance companies, we have the pharmaceutical companies who charge Americans more for our medication than they do the rest of the world.  Figure out how much money Big Pharma spends annually on advertising alone – those 30 second spots where we have to hear the list of potential side effects.  That after they tell us that if you cough you may have some horrendous thing that could kill you so you need to take their medication.

People actually have to take other medication to deal with the side effects from other medication.  This is lunacy.

Bring in Medicare for all – dump the insurance companies and tell Big Pharma that we’re no longer going to pay their insane rates for medication.  Period.

The Lobbyist firm, America’s Health Insurance Plans says on their website “Supporting Bipartisan Reforms.”  As long as it doesn’t interfere with the corporate profits.

AHIP’s President and CEO is Karen Ignagni.  She seems to have the most power in this healthcare reform debate.  As the top lobbyist for the insurance companies, she definitely doesn’t have the best interests of Americans at heart.

Karen Ignagni

Karen Ignagni

According to Money, Ignagni made (I purposely didn’t say earned) $1,236,432 in 2006.  Numbers in 2008 vary but including salary, bonus and deferred compensation she easily surpassed $1 million.   It does look like she earns the money the insurance companies pay her and her company.

Do we really want people like Ignagni fighting the battles against us?  We need to kick the lobbyists out of Washington and the first step is to set up Medicare for All, take healthcare away from the insurance companies and lobbyists and turn it over to Americans and their doctors.  It IS as simple as that.

The greed from the insurance companies is amazing.  They could have easily banded together to propose a fair and competitive process where each company submits their plan choices and all Americans can review each option, selecting the plan best suited for them and their family.

When we talk cost, how much money do we already have deducted from our paychecks to cover the insurance premiums?  All that remains is covering the uninsured.  I doubt that would cost $800 billion.

But the insurance companies have pissed me off so I no longer want an option that keeps them around.  I want a Medicare for All plan.  Before the Bush Administration privatized part of Medicare, older Americans had a great thing going AND it was run by the government.  Wow socialized medicine.

And the VA is socialized medicine too and Bill Kristol said on The Daily Show that US veterans had the best medical coverage in the world.

So enough is enough.  Time to take back our health from the insurance and pharmaceutical companies.

More angering items from the AP story:

“We’ve got ourselves a real health care shooting war now,” said Robert Laszewski, a former health insurance executive turned consultant. “The industry has come to the conclusion that the way things are going in Congress, we’ll have a … formula that will be disastrous for their business, so they can’t stand on the sidelines any longer.”

First of all, the insurance companies haven’t been on the sidelines.  They have been utilizing their lobbyists and had significant influence on the wording of the Baucus bill.  Second, they want the status quo and are totally unwilling to give up anything in this compromise.  Americans are already being asked to give up quality and cost effective healthcare so these greedy companies can continue to rake in the profits.

“The misleading and harmful claims made by the profit-driven insurance companies are politicking for corporate gain at its worst,” said Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va.

You think?

The politicians in favor of the single-payer (Medicare for All) system need to band together and get the word out.  They need to organize their constituents to come out and fight for what is right for all Americans.  We know the media is behind the insurance and pharmaceutical companies as they would like to keep their advertising revenue.

Another huge issue I have is that this bill won’t be fully in effect until 2013!   Notice that it’s set to go AFTER the next presidential election.  Can we really wait another 4 years for this garbage plan that solidifies the insurance company’s stranglehold on American’s health?

Worse still, this bill will only cover 94 percent of eligible Americans up from 83 percent today.  Can the 6 percent really afford not to have healthcare coverage?

How is this healthcare reform?  As I’ve said before – this bill is healthcare reform without the reform.

We need a bill that will cover 100 percent of Americans.  Anything short of that is pure failure.  Anything that permits companies to deny coverage and stand between Americans and their doctors is unacceptable.

I’m sick and tired of Americans having to fight their insurance companies in order to get coverage for life saving medical treatment.

This has got to stop.  Americans need to fight back.  If our elected representatives will not take up the fight for us in Washington, we need to throw them all out.

In Greed We Trust

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Barack Obama · Democrats · Politics · Republicans · US Congress
Tagged: , , , , , ,

Pondering Palin and Levi

October 8, 2009 · Leave a Comment

With Sarah Palin’s new book coming out next month, I thought I’d share a few thoughts I had.

  • Did Palin really write a book of over 400 pages?  As soon as I heard of the book, I did a Google search on ‘Sarah Palin Going Rogue ghostwriter’ and the name Lynn Vincent came back.  Do your own research on her.
  • With Going Rogue coming out are we surprised that Bristol’s ex-fiancé Levi Johnston announced plans to pose for Playgirl?  (Gives a new meaning to Going Rogue).
  • When Palin resigned, Johnston said that she was resigning to make money.  I recalled an article stating that there were restrictions to the ways an Alaska politician could make money.  When I heard of the book, I thought of that Johnston line.  A little research and I found the Politico article from October 2008 which said that she could possibly make money for writing her memoirs but would not be able to make money from speaking engagements.  Do we know how much Palin made last month when she spoke in Hong Kong?
  • And to Palin’s defense – I am nothing if not fair – Johnston has criticized Palin and like I said in the last paragraph said she is in it for the money.  What has Johnston done since the election?  He appeared on Tyra Banks and has already appeared (clothed) in GQ and Vanity Fair.  The more he talks, the more coverage he gets.  Now we’re going to have to see his Johnston as he does his photo shoot for Playgirl. 
  • I have no problem with people being enamored with Palin.  My problem is that these people believe that she should be the president.  We’ve already had a president for 8 years that could not complete a coherent sentence and he speaks more intelligently than Palin does.  Many of us had difficulty with the concept of voting for John Kerry because much of the time he doesn’t make sense.  International leaders whose primary language is not English should NEVER speak more intelligently than our own president.
  • When she goes on her book tour I wonder if the host will ask her specifics about the book.  Since we know she didn’t write it and I’m sure she didn’t read it, how could she answer the questions?  Then again, no one will be able to challenge the answers because the host will not have read the book and neither will have the viewers.
  • If Palin’s base actually try to read Going Rogue, will they become disenchanted with her over the probable lack of You betcha’s?   Actually, I more expect her base to say look ‘she is intelligent – see the big words she wrote in her book.’
  • If she runs for president and loses, does she become the next Stephen Baldwin or Tom DeLay?  (Conservatives who frequent reality programs.)  I’d love to see her on Are You Smarter Than A Fifth Grader.

palin and levi

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Democrats · Politics · Republicans · Sarah Palin
Tagged: ,

The War on Texting While Driving

October 8, 2009 · Leave a Comment

More cities are banning texting while driving citing the recent study by the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute that showed that drivers who text while driving are 23 times as likely to have an accident other drivers.

This law does make sense but why are they only going after the people who text?  The Obama Administration said that the problem was ‘distracted drivers.’  I agree with that.

I absolutely get annoyed at drivers who are looking at their phones texting while driving – especially with the ones with both hands on their phone while both the phone and their hands rest on the top of the steering wheel.

The problem is much more widespread than that.

First of all, how will they identify the texters who have mastered the skill of one-handed texting without looking at the phone?  Their hand can be at their side and they can compose an entire text without taking their eyes off of the road.  A quick look down and they can make sure they fire it to the correct person.

Then you have the people who receive a text.  Is reading an incoming text also going to be illegal?

What about dialing the phone to call someone or looking at the caller id and answering the incoming call?

What about handling the GPS while driving?  Can we no longer change the radio channel or adjust the volume?

Or reading a newspaper?  This one drives me nuts. 

What about the people who are too lazy or late to finish grooming at home?  Ever see those people who shave or put on makeup in the car?  I wonder if an eyeliner pencil ever went in someone’s eye after an accident.

How about the people who eat while driving?  If a tomato falls out of that sloppy burger and onto your shirt or dress, you’re bound to be distracted.  Not to mention the hand that is holding the burger should actually be on the wheel.

Ever see anyone changing their clothes in the car? 

If you’re a parent, you know that you’re easily distracted by a crying child, one who gets sick or just a kid that is carrying on.  “Are we there yet?”  How many times have we heard from our parents or said to our kids – “if you don’t stop this instant, I’m turning the car around.’

Driving is a series of distractions – some controllable and others obviously not.  Why pick on just texting?  And why start now?

This problem has been around since at least I was a child.

I’m guessing that the problem is also the people pushing this law are mostly older Americans who can’t understand that new-fangled message system on the phone.  After all the Jitterbug doesn’t have texting, does it?

makeup driving

 

eating_driving

 

At least she's not texting!

At least she's not texting!

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Barack Obama · News · Politics
Tagged: ,

Birthers Taking It Up A Notch With Infomercial in South

September 29, 2009 · 2 Comments

You’d figure that by now they’d admit that they are wrong.  That’s not how the right works.  They’ll continue to beat a dead horse until the tide turns their way.

We’ve been hearing the nonsense that President Obama was not actually born in this country since the primaries last year.  Seeing the copy of his certificate of live birth didn’t stop the insanity nor did non-partisan sites like Fact Check who verified that POTUS was in fact born in Hawaii.

We’ve seen borderline tactics used by Congressional representatives who said things like ‘I have no reason to believe that Obama wasn’t born in this country but …’

People who call themselves journalists, like Lou Dobbs, continue to press the non-issue.

We have now been hit with the next wave.

Bill Keller from LivePrayer.com has posted a video entitled ‘Where Was President Obama Born’ complete with creepy music and a guest – Attorney and executive director of United States Justice Foundation Gary Kreep.  This infomercial is also running on some network affiliates in the south.

The video follows along with the Birthers claim that President Obama was actually born in Kenya as ‘his paternal grandmother’ says.

They say that the certificate of live birth that we have seen repeatedly ‘does not prove anything.’

Three times we are subjected to a commercial on what to do in order to help.  They provide a telephone number that they ask the viewer to call.  A $30 donation will land you a ‘Got a birth certificate’ bumper sticker.

*  *  *  *  *

Gary Kreep (ironically named) started the United States Justice Foundation 30 years ago.  The USJF helps create ‘conservative, pro-family organizations to help preserve traditional family values in this nation.’

gary kreep

Gary Kreep

As such, he has worked tirelessly to make sure that the president produces a birth certificate.  What type of traditional family values is he hoping to create here?

Kreep pointed out that you don’t hear about this on the news.  What news is he watching?  I had been bombarded with these birther claims on and off since the primaries.  He said only Rush Limbaugh has referred to this when he joked that God and President Obama are alike because neither have a birth certificate.

What about the Fox Noise machine?  Lou Dobbs?  It is a ridiculous accusation and any viewer that believes this nonsense is a mindless drone incapable of absorbing facts from various points of time and reaching a logical, intelligent conclusion – exactly the type of viewer they are attempting to reach.

Rather than waste time addressing this tired old matter again – feel free to go to the following sites:

Snopes:

Fact Check:

PolitiFact:

*  *  *  *  *

This is from the usjd.net website which Kreep states is a non-profit organization.

USJF shall not, directly or indirectly, intervene, or participate, in a political campaign on behalf of, or in opposition to, any candidate for public office.

USJF shall not endorse any candidate or contribute money to any candidate for political office.

USJF shall not provide goods or services to a candidate’s campaign, raise funds from others in support of or in opposition to a candidate, distribute statements for or in opposition to a candidate, or conduct any other activity that favors or opposes a candidate for political office.

Of course, Kreep forgot about these 3 statements while he was filing lawsuits regarding the birther movement during the 2008 presidential election.

Bill Keller 2

Bill Keller started the Live Prayer website in 1999.

Directly from LivePrayer:

Liveprayer.Com was founded for the sole purpose of having a site on the internet where people can go 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for prayer. The whole mission of Liveprayer.Com is to give those who are hurting…HOPE. The common bond all men and women share regardless where they live in the world or their economic standing, is the trials and tribulations of life.

On the website, they also state that they are a 501(c)(3) organization – in other words tax exempt.

From the IRS (Exemption Requirements)

To be tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, an organization must be organized and operated exclusively for exempt purposes set forth in section 501(c)(3), and none of its earnings may inure to any private shareholder or individual. In addition, it may not be an action organization, i.e., it may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial part of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates.

- snip -

Section 501(c)(3) organizations are restricted in how much political and legislative (lobbying) activities they may conduct. For a detailed discussion, see Political and Lobbying Activities. For more information about lobbying activities by charities, see the article Lobbying Issues; for more information about political activities of charities, see the FY-2002 CPE topic Election Year Issues.

For more information on the restrictions of political campaign intervention by Section 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Organizations:

Now of course, it does refer mostly to political campaigns but should apply due to the below highlighted items.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. Contributions to political campaign funds or public statements of position (verbal or written) made on behalf of the organization in favor of or in opposition to any candidate for public office clearly violate the prohibition against political campaign activity.  Violating this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes.

Certain activities or expenditures may not be prohibited depending on the facts and circumstances.  For example, certain voter education activities (including presenting public forums and publishing voter education guides) conducted in a non-partisan manner do not constitute prohibited political campaign activity. In addition, other activities intended to encourage people to participate in the electoral process, such as voter registration and get-out-the-vote drives, would not be prohibited political campaign activity if conducted in a non-partisan manner.

On the other hand, voter education or registration activities with evidence of bias that (a) would favor one candidate over another; (b) oppose a candidate in some manner; or (c) have the effect of favoring a candidate or group of candidates, will constitute prohibited participation or intervention.

‘. . . voter education . . . with evidence of bias that . . . b) oppose a candidate in some manner . . . will constitute prohibited participation . . .’.

The fact is that this politically charged video on the Live Prayer website violates the restrictions of tax-exempt organizations and as such the IRS should revoke the tax-exempt status of both Live Prayer (Bill Keller) and United States Justice Foundation (Gary Kreep).

At the very least, Kreep – representing the USJF – is guilty of violating the tax-exempt status during the 2008 presidential campaign when President Obama was a candidate.

Watch Video from LivePrayer website or you can watch the videos here.  The YouTube page for LivePrayer misspells President Obama’s name as ‘Barrack.’

→ 2 CommentsCategories: Barack Obama · Democrats · Politics · Republicans
Tagged: , , , ,

Swine Flu – Are You Scared Yet?

September 28, 2009 · Leave a Comment

We are still being told that we should fear the H1N1 virus – also known as the swine flu.

The article in the South Florida Sun-Sentinel opens with ‘No worse than seasonal flu, so far.’

The second line (actual title) is more calming – ‘After 6 months, swine flu looks pretty mild.

Then they drop the fear bomb with the sub-title – ‘Danger of H1N1 virus is not what it is but the potential of what it could become.’

Even before reading the actual article, I was told all I needed to know.  It’s all about fearing the potential.  We are programmed to fear worst case scenario, fear the unknown, fear of a boogey-man.

We all fear another terrorist attack, Global Warming, killer bees, hurricanes, earthquakes, wildfires, bird flu, swine flu, and so on.  Let’s not forget ‘side effects may include . . . ‘.

Both political parties make us frightened.  According to the right, we better fear ‘the gays’ and they’ll inflict their lifestyle onto the rest of us.  And the left has us worrying if we don’t stop made-made Global Warming we’re doomed as doomed can be.

Once a hurricane is less than a week a way, we are bombarded with non-stop news briefs hyping up the storm.  We are shown long lines at The Home Depot and Publix as everyone is stocking up for the impending doom.

It doesn’t matter what the alert, the media will hype it up.  They, of course, sell papers and gain viewers with each fear.  The more deadly the better.  And if they could make it about YOU then you could be hooked.

Shortly after the first outbreak of H1N1 in Mexico the media went to work alerting us to this widespread pandemic that would surely ensue.

Anyone coughs and we’re concerned that they are suffering from the swine flu.  Companies and restaurants put up hand sanitizers at entrances – which now reminds me of being on a cruise ship.

On October 6th, the swine flu vaccine should become available.  Insurance companies are offering to pay for the vaccine without co-pays.  Then it must be serious if the insurance companies don’t expect to profit from it.

I must say that I agree with Bill Maher who said on Twitter ‘If u get a swine flu shot ur an idiot.’

I know a number of people who over the years have gotten flu shots only to come down with the flu.  Isn’t that the purpose of the vaccine – to prevent the flu?

Back to the Sun-Sentinel for a minute:

“As the new bug circulates, health officials fear it may mix with others to create a new version that spreads faster or causes more deaths. For instance, the bird flu that appeared in Asia in 2006 kills most who get it but does not spread easily in humans. A bad scenario would be if that bird flu combined with the new, easily spread H1N1, said Virginia flu expert Richard Wenzel, past president of the International Society for Infectious Diseases.”

Now we’re worried about mutating diseases.  What if that bird flu came back?

Actually, that could happen in a lab.  Isn’t that how we have killer bees?

According to the article, more people may get swine flu than seasonal flu but seasonal flu kills a greater percentage.

“Also, the World Health Organization this week said two dozen cases of swine flu were resistant to the vaccine. On the plus side, everyone who had the flu will be immune to getting it again.”

This article admits that the vaccine may not work.  And it says that you will be immune to a reoccurrence.  That is, of course, unless it mutates with some other disease.   I was always told growing up that once I had chicken pox, I’d never get it again.  They didn’t warn us about shingles.

Where more people die from many other things, maybe I’ll worry about them.  Instead, I think I’ll try my best to take care of myself and enjoy life on a daily basis not worrying about every thing that comes along.

Oh and I’ve cancelled my subscription to the newspaper.

If you wake up looking like this, don’t go to work…

If you wake up looking like this, don’t go to work…

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Politics
Tagged: , , ,