Questioning Obama’s presidential eligibility returns

I thought the issue was dead. Step aside Joe the Plumber. Robert L. Schultz the anti-tax activist is searching for his 15 minutes. Schultz last year was ordered to shut down a website advising how to avoid paying taxes.

Now he is challenging President-elect Barack Obama’s eligibility by questioning his citizenship. Every point he brings up has already been refuted.

But it seems that there are many people that thirst to find out something scary about our next president. Some of my top searches support this as they seek out whether Obama was sworn into the U.S. Senate using a Bible or Koran, the terrorist fist bump (I personally love this post), whether or not Obama is a Socialist or our greatest fear.

Schultz is the chairman of We The People Foundation which took out full-page ads this week in order to raise the question about whether Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate is authentic.

[Read the ad here]

We’ve heard this crap during the election campaign. Barack Obama’s Fight the Smears website provided documented proof that was verified by Fact Check.

The Bruce Blog provides additional proof that Obama was indeed born in Hawaii.

United States Supreme Court to weigh in

Though there have been numerous lawsuits filed on this – I have to say – nonsense, the one that will get the most attention is Leo Donofrio v New Jersey Secretary of State Nina Mitchell Wells. This case has been referred to the U.S. Supreme Court justices for conference by [sarcasm] the highly unbiased, non-partisan Clarence Thomas. The case is scheduled to be heard today. [Source: Chicago Tribune]

Other cases:

Philip J. Berg filed a suit in Pennsylvania in August and “sought to enjoin the Democratic National Committee from nominating Obama.”

Alan Keyes filed a suit in California seeking to halt the certification of the votes.

A Kentucky man sought to have a federal judge review Obama’s original birth certificate.

Andy Martin filed a case in Hawaii – which was dismissed. [An aside: Andy Martin is the anti-Semite that appeared on Sean Hannity’s Fox News program. Obama’s press secretary Robert Gibbs schooled Hannity over Martin.]

An Ohio man also filed a suit which was dismissed.

One man filed 5 additional suits that were dismissed in Hawaii. Per the Chicago Tribune, this man “is currently suing the ‘Peoples Association of Human, Animals Conceived God’s and Religions, John McCain and USA Govt.’ the plaintiff previously sought to sue Wikipedia and ‘All News Media’.”

Addressing the We the People Foundation Ad

The [Ft. Lauderdale] Sun-Sentinel provided a point-by-point response to the accusations in the ad. 


Here are the allegations raised in Schulz’s ad, and some relevant facts:

•The birth form released by Obama was “an unsigned, forged and thoroughly discredited” live birth form, Schulz says.

Last summer, Obama’s campaign presented a digital copy of his certificate of live birth. After critics questioned its authenticity, staff at, a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, said they had seen, held and examined the actual birth certificate.

•”Hawaiian officials will not confirm” that Obama was born in their state, Schulz says.

Initially, Hawaiian officials said that privacy laws prevented them from releasing a copy or confirming that Obama’s copy was authentic. But in late October as questions persisted, Hawaii’s health director and head of vital statistics reviewed Obama’s birth certificate in the department’s vault and vouched for its authenticity.

•Schulz says that legal affidavits state Obama was born in Kenya.

The affidavits that Schulz refers to are filings by the Obama critics themselves in the court cases challenging Obama’s citizenship.

•Obama’s paternal grandmother is recorded on tape saying she attended Obama’s birth in Kenya, Schulz says.

The group’s Web site posted what it says is a transcript of a long-distance phone conversation in Swahili and English from late October between a questioner in the United States and Sarah Hussein Obama, in her Kenyan home. The translator said he was one of two interpreters conducting the interview in a crowded hut during a celebration, over a speaker phone that dropped the call three times. A copy of the recording was not provided by Schulz.

• Schulz says that “U.S. law in effect in 1961 [the year of Obama’s birth] denied citizenship to any child born in Kenya if the father was Kenyan and the mother was not yet 19 years of age.”

If a child is born in the United States—as Hawaiian officials state that Obama was—that child is a U.S. citizen regardless of his or her parents’ nationalities. If born to an American parent outside the U.S., the law at the time would require the U.S. citizen parent to be at least 19, which Obama’s mother was not. The provisions of this law were subsequently loosened and made retroactive for government employees serving abroad and their families. It appears that this would not apply to Obama’s mother. The matter would seem to be academic: Hawaiian officials vouch for Obama’s birth certificate.

•Schulz says that in 1965, Obama’s mother relinquished whatever Kenyan or U.S. citizenship she and Obama had by marrying an Indonesian and becoming a naturalized Indonesian citizen.

U.S. law lists the specific acts and formal procedures necessary to relinquish U.S. nationality. The statute requires the acts be performed voluntarily and with the intention of relinquishing one’s nationality. In many instances, one must be 18 to renounce one’s citizenship. Obama moved to Indonesia in 1968 and moved back to Hawaii while still in grade school. There is no indication that Obama renounced his U.S. citizenship.



What cracks me up is that Shultz actually has the audacity to say that this is not a partisan issue with him. 

“We never get involved in politics,” he said of We The People. “We avoid it like the plague.”

To find out more about Schultz’s We the People Foundation and their non-involvement in politics – click here.

And now we wait to see if the Supreme Court intervenes once more in our election process.





17 responses to “Questioning Obama’s presidential eligibility returns

  1. All of these whackjobs who are behind the lawsuits or brought that lawsuits are just that – whackjobs! Keyes is just jealous of Obama and pissed he lost to him in the Senate race in 2004.

    Go read about Berg at Wiki. He’s a joke as a lawyer. Sued for malpractice and fined & ordered to take ethics training.

    All these people just want to push their own personal agendas. And the flames get fanned by the likes of PUMA. Enough said.

  2. I agree 100% with everything you said.

    Keyes is a joke.

    These whackjobs need some psychological help – quickly.

  3. Yeah, I talked about this today also, I cant even believe this is being taken seriously by the courts. Keyes is the ultimate whackjob that btw evangelicals loved, I don’t know what the hell they were thinking. These people who first pushed this are apart of the PUMA group that said 18 million of hillary supporters wont support Obama…we see how that turned out.
    The people pushing this case are probably the same ones who think the government is putting steroid in the drinking water. Maybe Justice Thomas is apart of that group, he sure the hell is acting like it.
    I don’t even think Alan Keyes ass would vote for him 🙂

  4. In America (we) love our whack jobs. Usually when they’re this ridiculous, they are from the south. HA! (I’m a southerner so I’m the only person who can make that joke). Ignoring these fools doesn’t seem to work. Can someone rub some antifungal creme on them to see if that would work? Could their mother’s please come and collect them?

  5. Hi – how do you make it snow?

  6. Go to theme and then click on extras and the option is there.

  7. Thanks, I just found it. Guess it’s a little something special for the holiday season. I had to change my theme so that the snow looked okay.

  8. I love the snow feature. Especially in South Florida.

  9. Annette, Missouri

    The only problem I have with them dismissing this case is, if SCOTUS actually rules on it that should put it to rest once and for all. However if they don’t the whackjobs at We The People will probably do just what he is threatening to do and that is to challenge everything PE Obama does over the next 4 years.

    And in 4 years when he is up for re-election, we will have to deal with this mess all over again and have to put up with the witch from Wasilla not only saying he pals around with terrorists but he is a muslim who isn’t even a natural born citizen of the US.

    So there is much to be said for SCOTUS to rule on this.

  10. Annette,
    You make a very good point. The only thing I’ll throw out there is that if the Supreme Court does rule on this in favor of Obama and logic, the whackjobs will cry that the court is filled with justices that legislate from the bench.

    I fear that the whackjobs will never stop because it is not in their nature to live in reality. That’s why they’re whackjobs.

  11. This needs to be cleared up. America does not need a usurper in the White House, and Obama – if not a usurper – doesn’t need this hanging over his head throughout his administration.

    Two things that concern me about the whole issue:

    1) Obama’s refusal to provide one simple document, one that McCain cheerfully provided when the same question arose about his extra-American birth.

    2) The dismissal at the federal courts’ level of similar suits due to “lack of standing.” If an American citizen doesn’t have the right to demand that a candidate prove his eligibility to hold elected office, who does?

  12. give it up already, he’s your president, deal with it.

  13. How many times do you need to have this cleared up? There is nothing there so just move on already.

  14. Then why the constant refusal to provide the certificate?

  15. he did provide the certificate! I swear if the certificate was on your ass and imprinted the name Barrack Obama US of A, you still wouldn’t think it was legit.

  16. I guess the following isn’t sufficient for you?

    In case you haven’t noticed, our economy is in the crapper. The banks, auto makers, media companies and many other industries are struggling. Meanwhile, you continue to harp on something that has long since been resolved and the Supreme Court opted not to waste their time on it.

  17. Great line Sensico. lol